final adjustments before the hand in

This commit is contained in:
2025-09-15 11:50:00 +00:00
parent 221bdcda07
commit 04598e6bb1
8 changed files with 48 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ The maps resemble each other closely and we focus on the residual maps
// rename?
that highlight specific deviations produced when changing the accretion model. They show that fixing the mean accretion rate is not sufficient to fully represent the complex reionization behavior.
The coupling coefficient map sees a increase in all regions which is explained by the stronger emission of Lyman-$alpha$ photons at these late stages. At the considered redshift, the mean model uses $alpha approx 0.51$. Regions where this reversal has not occured are in theory possible but don't seem to appear with this particular halo population.
The coupling coefficient map sees an increase in all regions which is explained by the stronger emission of Lyman-$alpha$ photons at these late stages. At the considered redshift, the mean model uses $alpha approx 0.51$. Regions where this reversal has not occured are in theory possible but don't seem to appear with this particular halo population.
As before, the kinetic temperature maps reflect the observation made for the signals. Most regions are colder than in the fiducial case due to the lower heating by fewer stars. The halos lag behind but some high accretion halos seem to catch up already, they practically vanish in the residual map.
These differences are only visible because the mean model fails to capture this diversity of halo histories.